Topic summary
⁠95%1 analyzed article/video1,010 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Section 301 Of The Trade Act Of results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Negativity Bias, and Overconfidence Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 29.3% saturation with 888 hits. Analysis detected 5,677 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,030 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠83% (2,813 of 16,562 topics). This Section 301 Of The Trade Act Of is worse (more manipulative) than 83.00% of the peer group.
Section 301 Of The Trade Act Of
Topic details
Total words: 3,030
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

83% percentile
025507510083.0% percentile
6.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 29.3%29.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.1%3.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 26.7%26.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 14.8%14.8%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 11.8%11.8%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 11.3%11.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.5%9.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 8.3%8.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 29.3%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 26.7%, sitewide 11.1%Negativity Bias: Topic 15.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 15.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 14.8%, sitewide 4.6%Slippery Slope: Topic 11.8%, sitewide 1.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 11.7%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 11.6%, sitewide 8.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 1.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 2.0%Begging the Question: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 1.7%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.0%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.4%Indoctrination: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.0%Straw Man: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos