Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video762 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Seattle Seahawks Vs New England Patriots results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 48.1% saturation with 1,099 hits. Analysis detected 5,870 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,286 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠89% (1,973 of 16,562 topics). This Seattle Seahawks Vs New England Patriots is worse (more manipulative) than 88.10% of the peer group.
Seattle Seahawks Vs New England Patriots
Topic details
Total words: 2,286
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

88% percentile
025507510088.1% percentile
7.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 48.1%48.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 37.9%37.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 23.0%23.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 18.6%18.6%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Topic 9.3%9.3%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Topic 9.7%9.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 10.4%10.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.3%4.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 48.1%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 37.9%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Topic 23.2%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 23.0%, sitewide 8.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 18.6%, sitewide 4.6%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 12.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 11.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 6.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 3.1%Hindsight Bias: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 1.4%Straw Man: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 0.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 7.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 2.0%Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 5.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 2.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Bandwagon: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Red Herring: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos