Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos743 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Seattle Seahawks results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Hindsight Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 20.3% saturation with 964 hits. Analysis detected 5,268 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,749 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠58% (7,042 of 16,559 topics). This Seattle Seahawks is worse (more manipulative) than 57.50% of the peer group.
Seattle Seahawks
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,749
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

58% percentile
025507510057.5% percentile
3.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.4%2.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.3%8.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 13.2%13.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 20.3%20.3%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Topic 7.5%7.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.2%0.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 3.1%3.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.6%5.6%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 20.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 13.2%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 7.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 1.4%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.5%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos