Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,074 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Seattle Metropolitan Area results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Anecdotal, and Loss Aversion, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 8.2% saturation with 352 hits. Analysis detected 2,102 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,296 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠13% (14,403 of 16,562 topics). This Seattle Metropolitan Area is better (less manipulative) than 87.00% of the peer group.
Seattle Metropolitan Area
Topic details
Total words: 4,296
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

13% percentile
025507510013.0% percentile
1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.4%2.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.9%1.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.9%0.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.3%0.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.9%1.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Loss Aversion: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 2.5%Recency Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.4%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos