Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video381 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Seattle Mariners results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Optimism Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 17.7% saturation with 270 hits. Analysis detected 1,788 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,524 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠71% (4,820 of 16,562 topics). This Seattle Mariners is worse (more manipulative) than 70.90% of the peer group.
Seattle Mariners
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,524
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

71% percentile
025507510070.9% percentile
4.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.8%7.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.3%5.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.5%4.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 17.7%17.7%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 10.8%10.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.1%0.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.3%2.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.5%4.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 19.2%Halo Effect: Topic 17.7%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 11.1%Unattributed Quote: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 1.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 5.2%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 1.5%Indoctrination: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos