Topic summary
⁠76%1 analyzed article/video704 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Seattle Economy results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Appeal to Emotion, and In-Group Bias, with Politically Left Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 16.9% saturation with 475 hits. Analysis detected 3,246 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,816 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠64% (6,103 of 16,562 topics). This Seattle Economy is worse (more manipulative) than 63.20% of the peer group.
Seattle Economy
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,816
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

63% percentile
025507510063.2% percentile
3.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.3%5.3%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 16.9%16.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.0%6.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 9.6%9.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.1%8.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.5%1.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 5.9%5.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.0%6.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 19.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 16.9%, sitewide 2.0%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 11.1%Indoctrination: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 0.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 0.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 5.6%, sitewide 0.8%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 3.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.3%Loss Aversion: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.5%Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.4%Bandwagon: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos