Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video79 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Seattle Eats results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Anchoring Bias, Halo Effect, and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 64.1% saturation with 152 hits. Analysis detected 862 faulty-reasoning hits from 237 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 21.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠99% (205 of 16,562 topics). This Seattle Eats is worse (more manipulative) than 98.80% of the peer group.
Seattle Eats
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 237
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

99% percentile
025507510098.8% percentile
21.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles237 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 60.8%60.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 54.0%54.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 49.0%49.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 64.1%64.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 23.6%23.6%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Topic 16.0%16.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 16.9%16.9%Composition/DivisionSitewide 0.2%Topic 11.8%11.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.1%5.1%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Topic 11.0%11.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Framing Effect: Topic 64.1%, sitewide 26.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 60.8%, sitewide 4.0%Halo Effect: Topic 54.0%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 49.0%, sitewide 11.1%Anecdotal: Topic 23.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 16.9%, sitewide 4.6%Bandwagon: Topic 16.0%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 13.9%, sitewide 8.1%Composition/Division: Topic 11.8%, sitewide 0.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 11.0%, sitewide 9.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 11.0%, sitewide 1.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 6.0%Primacy Effect: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 0.9%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos