Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Seat Belt Usage results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Availability Heuristic, and Appeal to Authority, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 30.7% saturation with 251 hits. Analysis detected 569 faulty-reasoning hits from 818 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Seat Belt Usage is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Seat Belt Usage
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 818
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles818 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 30.7%30.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.8%3.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.8%3.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.9%4.9%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Topic 3.8%3.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 3.8%3.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 15.0%15.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 3.8%3.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Indoctrination: Topic 30.7%, sitewide 0.0%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 15.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 4.6%Begging the Question: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.7%IndoctrinationSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos