Topic summary
⁠46%1 analyzed article/video1,113 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Seabed Mining results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 7.9% saturation with 263 hits. Analysis detected 2,325 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,339 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠34% (10,457 of 15,759 topics). This Seabed Mining is better (less manipulative) than 66.40% of the peer group.
Seabed Mining
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,339
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

34% percentile
025507510033.6% percentile
2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.8%5.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.4%7.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.9%7.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.8%0.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.8%0.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.7%2.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.3%4.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.3%Slippery Slope: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.7%Indoctrination: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.8%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos