Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 365 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Screens results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) , Availability Heuristic , and Appeal to Emotion , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 11% saturation with 161 hits . Analysis detected 1,060 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,460 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of 68% (5,413 of 16,562 topics). This Screens is worse (more manipulative) than 67.30% of the peer group. Screens
Topic details
Total words: 1,460
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
67% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 67.3% percentile 4.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 5.3% 5.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.2% 6.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.0% 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Topic 8.6% 8.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 11.0% 11.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 5.4% 5.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Topic 11.0%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 9.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 8.6%, sitewide 3.3% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 4.6% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.2% Slippery Slope: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.7% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.1% Burden of Proof: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst