Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,040 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Screen Time results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Hasty Generalization, and Anecdotal, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.8% saturation with 696 hits. Analysis detected 5,964 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,460 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠39% (9,859 of 16,104 topics). This Screen Time is better (less manipulative) than 61.20% of the peer group.
Screen Time
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 6,460
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

39% percentile
025507510038.8% percentile
2.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.2%2.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.8%2.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.8%10.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.8%1.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.5%4.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.6%1.6%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.7%0.7%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Topic 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 5.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.8%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.8%Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos