Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,585 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Scientific Societies results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Availability Heuristic, and Confirmation Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 7.8% saturation with 496 hits. Analysis detected 4,011 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,340 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠38% (10,375 of 16,562 topics). This Scientific Societies is better (less manipulative) than 62.60% of the peer group.
Scientific Societies
Topic details
Total words: 6,340
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

37% percentile
025507510037.4% percentile
2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.7%0.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.4%3.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.1%5.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.3%1.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 3.0%3.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.3%4.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.7%1.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.8%4.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 6.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 4.6%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.0%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.5%Begging the Question: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.1%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.4%Indoctrination: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos