Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video76 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Science Journalism results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Authority, and Halo Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 28.3% saturation with 86 hits. Analysis detected 256 faulty-reasoning hits from 304 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 21.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠99% (209 of 16,562 topics). This Science Journalism is worse (more manipulative) than 98.70% of the peer group.
Science Journalism
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 304
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

99% percentile
025507510098.7% percentile
21.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles304 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 28.3%28.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 18.4%18.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 19.1%19.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 18.4%18.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 28.3%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 19.1%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 18.4%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Topic 18.4%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos