Topic summary
⁠68%1 analyzed article/video3,629 analyzed words
BS Summary: These School Regulation results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 17.2% saturation with 1,870 hits. Analysis detected 9,870 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,887 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠26% (12,384 of 16,562 topics). This School Regulation is better (less manipulative) than 74.80% of the peer group.
School Regulation
Topic details
Total words: 10,887
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

25% percentile
025507510025.2% percentile
2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles10.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.7%4.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 17.2%17.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.1%0.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.9%0.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.1%0.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.1%3.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 15.8%15.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 17.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 15.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.3%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos