Topic summary
94% 1 analyzed article/video 388 analyzed words
BS Summary: These School Data Transparency results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , Indoctrination , and Framing Effect , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 21.6% saturation with 336 hits . Analysis detected 1,485 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,552 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5% and a BS Rank of 83% (3,830 of 21,785 topics). This School Data Transparency is worse (more manipulative) than 82.40% of the peer group. School Data Transparency
Topic details
Total words: 1,552
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
82% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 82.4% percentile 5.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 7.9% 7.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 21.6% 21.6% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Topic 15.8% 15.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 8.6% 8.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.8% 3.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 26.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 21.6%, sitewide 6.0% Negativity Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 15.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 15.8%, sitewide 0.5% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 9.1% Indoctrination: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 0.0% Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 4.6% Begging the Question: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Loss Aversion: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst