Topic summary
⁠47%1 analyzed article/video473 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Scholarship results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem, Confirmation Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16.8% saturation with 317 hits. Analysis detected 1,407 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,892 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠73% (6,236 of 22,543 topics). This Scholarship is worse (more manipulative) than 72.30% of the peer group.
Scholarship
Topic details
Total words: 1,892
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

72% percentile
025507510072.3% percentile
3.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.6%2.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.2%1.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.7%1.7%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 6.9%6.9%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 5.4%5.4%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Topic 4.6%4.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 16.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 7.5%Ad Hominem: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 2.2%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 5.3%Halo Effect: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 1.1%Burden of Proof: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 0.4%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.9%Red Herring: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.7%Horn Effect: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.0%Begging the Question: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos