Topic summary
⁠57%2 analyzed articles/videos840 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Schengen Area results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Politically Right Leaning Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 6.8% saturation with 345 hits. Analysis detected 3,171 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,086 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠29% (15,670 of 21,863 topics). This Schengen Area is better (less manipulative) than 71.70% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

28% percentile
025507510028.3% percentile
1.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.0%6.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.1%2.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.2%6.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.9%0.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.8%0.8%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 5.8%5.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.9%0.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.7%1.7%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 1.4%Anecdotal: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos