Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video347 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Scaffolding Regulation results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Status Quo Bias, Indoctrination, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 14.8% saturation with 206 hits. Analysis detected 1,606 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,388 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠75% (4,210 of 16,562 topics). This Scaffolding Regulation is worse (more manipulative) than 74.60% of the peer group.
Scaffolding Regulation
Topic details
Total words: 1,388
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

75% percentile
025507510074.6% percentile
4.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 14.8%14.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 11.9%11.9%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Topic 13.0%13.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.7%10.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.4%9.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.3%1.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 10.6%10.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 5.3%5.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 14.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 15.9%Status Quo Bias: Topic 13.0%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Topic 11.9%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 5.3%, sitewide 0.8%Anecdotal: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.0%False Dilemma: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.5%Begging the Question: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Special Pleading: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.3%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.4%Horn Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos