Topic summary
⁠91%1 analyzed article/video1,201 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sats results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Biased Writer Voice, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 17.2% saturation with 825 hits. Analysis detected 6,772 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,804 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠55% (7,457 of 16,350 topics). This Sats is worse (more manipulative) than 54.40% of the peer group.
Sats
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,804
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

54% percentile
025507510054.4% percentile
3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.1%0.1%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 17.2%17.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.4%8.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 15.0%15.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 11.5%11.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.2%1.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.9%0.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.1%2.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.0%5.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 16.0%, sitewide 19.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 17.2%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 15.0%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 11.5%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 4.6%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 2.0%False Dilemma: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.5%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.7%Horn Effect: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Straw Man: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.9%Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos