Topic summary
⁠22%1 analyzed article/video1,620 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sapphic Representation results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Overconfidence Bias, and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 10.5% saturation with 510 hits. Analysis detected 2,702 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,860 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠28% (11,962 of 16,562 topics). This Sapphic Representation is better (less manipulative) than 72.20% of the peer group.
Sapphic Representation
Topic details
Total words: 4,860
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

28% percentile
025507510027.8% percentile
2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.2%3.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.5%1.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.5%0.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.5%1.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 10.5%10.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 10.4%10.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 4.6%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.1%Composition/Division: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.2%Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.0%Indoctrination: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos