Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video910 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sanctuary State Policies results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 15.8% saturation with 576 hits. Analysis detected 4,939 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,640 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠66% (5,743 of 16,562 topics). This Sanctuary State Policies is worse (more manipulative) than 65.30% of the peer group.
Sanctuary State Policies
Topic details
Total words: 3,640
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

65% percentile
025507510065.3% percentile
3.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 15.7%15.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.2%3.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 15.8%15.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 14.8%14.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 13.4%13.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.2%6.2%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.1%0.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.9%3.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 15.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 13.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 15.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 15.7%, sitewide 1.4%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 14.8%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.0%Ad Hominem: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 2.2%Anecdotal: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 4.0%Indoctrination: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 0.5%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos