Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video475 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sanctuary Policies results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Politically Right Leaning Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 27.9% saturation with 531 hits. Analysis detected 2,727 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,900 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠79% (3,598 of 16,562 topics). This Sanctuary Policies is worse (more manipulative) than 78.30% of the peer group.
Sanctuary Policies
Topic details
Total words: 1,900
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

78% percentile
025507510078.3% percentile
5.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 27.9%27.9%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 19.6%19.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 10.7%10.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.8%0.8%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Topic 7.0%7.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 23.2%23.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 15.8%15.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.8%4.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 27.9%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 23.2%, sitewide 26.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 19.6%, sitewide 1.4%Negativity Bias: Topic 15.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 7.5%Bandwagon: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 2.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 4.0%Horn Effect: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.7%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.4%False Dilemma: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos