Topic summary
⁠15%1 analyzed article/video1,440 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sanctuaries results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and False Dilemma, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 4.1% saturation with 177 hits. Analysis detected 1,835 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,320 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠6% (14,891 of 15,765 topics). This Sanctuaries is better (less manipulative) than 94.50% of the peer group.
Sanctuaries
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,320
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

6% percentile
02550751005.5% percentile
1.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.1%4.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.9%3.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.1%3.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.4%1.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.1%1.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.4%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos