Topic summary
⁠0%3 analyzed articles/videos729 analyzed words
BS Summary: These San Jose results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Negativity Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 10.2% saturation with 640 hits. Analysis detected 5,387 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,262 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠22% (12,386 of 15,765 topics). This San Jose is better (less manipulative) than 78.60% of the peer group.
San Jose
Topic ranking list
Topic details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

21% percentile
025507510021.4% percentile
2.0% BS Score3 analyzed articles6.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.5%9.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.6%4.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.3%8.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.2%2.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.3%3.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 10.2%10.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.1%3.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.6%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.5%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.0%Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos