Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,116 analyzed words
BS Summary: These San Diego Mosque Shooting results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Negativity Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 11.8% saturation with 526 hits. Analysis detected 5,155 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,464 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠58% (6,587 of 15,435 topics). This San Diego Mosque Shooting is worse (more manipulative) than 57.30% of the peer group.
San Diego Mosque Shooting
Topic details
Total words: 4,464
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

57% percentile
025507510057.3% percentile
3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.8%2.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.1%9.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.9%6.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 6.8%6.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 11.8%11.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.4%0.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 5.7%5.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.5%2.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 11.8%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.9%Indoctrination: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 0.0%Halo Effect: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 1.1%Anecdotal: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 5.2%False Dilemma: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.3%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.1%Straw Man: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.9%Recency Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.5%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.2%Bandwagon: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos