Topic summary
⁠25%1 analyzed article/video726 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Saints Running Back results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Halo Effect, and Optimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7% saturation with 203 hits. Analysis detected 1,308 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,904 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠13% (14,488 of 16,562 topics). This Saints Running Back is better (less manipulative) than 87.50% of the peer group.
Saints Running Back
Topic details
Total words: 2,904
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

13% percentile
025507510012.5% percentile
1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.1%5.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.0%7.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.0%1.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.4%1.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.3%0.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.1%1.1%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.0%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.8%Middle Ground: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos