Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video812 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Safety Guidelines results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Overconfidence Bias, and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 52.5% saturation with 1,706 hits. Analysis detected 3,002 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,248 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠70% (5,105 of 16,562 topics). This Safety Guidelines is worse (more manipulative) than 69.20% of the peer group.
Safety Guidelines
Topic details
Total words: 3,248
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

69% percentile
025507510069.2% percentile
4.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 52.5%52.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.9%0.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.8%1.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.6%1.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.0%1.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 6.2%6.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Indoctrination: Topic 52.5%, sitewide 0.0%Framing Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 4.6%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.5%Appeal to Nature: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.5%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 0.9%IndoctrinationSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos