Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,405 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sabbaticals results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Availability Heuristic, and Optimism Bias, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 9.5% saturation with 533 hits. Analysis detected 3,126 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,620 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠23% (12,771 of 16,562 topics). This Sabbaticals is better (less manipulative) than 77.10% of the peer group.
Sabbaticals
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 5,620
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

23% percentile
025507510022.9% percentile
2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.9%1.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.2%1.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.4%2.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.4%0.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 9.5%9.5%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 0.2%0.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 11.1%Anecdotal: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%Composition/Division: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.2%False Dilemma: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos