Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video696 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Russia Ukraine Conflict results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Self-Serving Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 17.4% saturation with 484 hits. Analysis detected 2,911 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,784 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠54% (7,633 of 16,562 topics). This Russia Ukraine Conflict is worse (more manipulative) than 53.90% of the peer group.
Russia Ukraine Conflict
Topic details
Total words: 2,784
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

54% percentile
025507510053.9% percentile
3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.7%8.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.2%7.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 17.4%17.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.6%7.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.8%2.8%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 7.9%7.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 19.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 17.4%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 8.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 3.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 5.3%Pessimism Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 1.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 4.6%Recency Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos