Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Russia Belarus Ukraine War results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Recency Bias, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 10.2% saturation with 445 hits. Analysis detected 4,254 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,372 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Russia Belarus Ukraine War is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Russia Belarus Ukraine War
Topic details
Total words: 4,372
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.2%7.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.2%5.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.0%10.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.0%1.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 6.2%6.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.1%1.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.9%1.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 8.1%Recency Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 2.7%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 1.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 1.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Slippery Slope: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 1.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos