Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,120 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rural Towns results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Optimism Bias, and In-Group Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 12.8% saturation with 286 hits. Analysis detected 2,214 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,240 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠69% (5,245 of 16,562 topics). This Rural Towns is worse (more manipulative) than 68.30% of the peer group.
Rural Towns
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,240
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

68% percentile
025507510068.3% percentile
4.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.6%3.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 12.8%12.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.3%2.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 12.1%12.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 11.6%11.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.7%5.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.4%2.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 11.2%11.2%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 12.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Topic 12.1%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 11.6%, sitewide 6.0%In-Group Bias: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 6.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 6.7%Bandwagon: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 2.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.7%Personal Incredulity: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos