Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video797 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rural Life results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Halo Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 5.3% saturation with 169 hits. Analysis detected 1,520 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,188 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠14% (14,312 of 16,562 topics). This Rural Life is better (less manipulative) than 86.40% of the peer group.
Rural Life
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,188
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

14% percentile
025507510013.6% percentile
1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.3%5.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.4%2.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.0%4.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.4%1.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.5%1.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.8%0.8%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.0%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.8%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos