Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 636 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Roxbury results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Appeal to Authority , and Confirmation Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 30.9% saturation with 591 hits . Analysis detected 4,036 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,910 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.8% and a BS Rank of 86% (2,458 of 16,562 topics). This Roxbury is worse (more manipulative) than 85.20% of the peer group. Roxbury
Topic details
Total words: 1,910
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
85% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 85.2% percentile 6.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Topic 13.6% 13.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 27.3% 27.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 16.1% 16.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 18.2% 18.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 12.4% 12.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 13.3% 13.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 15.0% 15.0% Red Herring Sitewide 0.7% Topic 4.8% 4.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 30.9%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 27.3%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 15.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Topic 18.2%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 16.1%, sitewide 7.5% Bandwagon: Topic 13.6%, sitewide 2.2% Availability Heuristic: Topic 13.3%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Topic 12.4%, sitewide 6.9% Hasty Generalization: Topic 12.2%, sitewide 8.1% Anchoring Bias: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 4.0% Anecdotal: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 5.2% Halo Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.3% Red Herring: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 0.7% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.6% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% Special Pleading: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.3% Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.6% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst