Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video636 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Roxbury results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Appeal to Authority, and Confirmation Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 30.9% saturation with 591 hits. Analysis detected 4,036 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,910 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.8% and a BS Rank of 86% (2,458 of 16,562 topics). This Roxbury is worse (more manipulative) than 85.20% of the peer group.
Roxbury
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,910
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

85% percentile
025507510085.2% percentile
6.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Topic 13.6%13.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 27.3%27.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 16.1%16.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 18.2%18.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 12.4%12.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.4%1.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.0%1.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 13.3%13.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 15.0%15.0%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Topic 4.8%4.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 30.9%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 27.3%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 15.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 18.2%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 16.1%, sitewide 7.5%Bandwagon: Topic 13.6%, sitewide 2.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 13.3%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 12.4%, sitewide 6.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 12.2%, sitewide 8.1%Anchoring Bias: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 4.0%Anecdotal: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 5.2%Halo Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.3%Red Herring: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 0.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.1%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.5%Special Pleading: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.6%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos