Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video838 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Romanticism results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Halo Effect, and Availability Heuristic, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 6% saturation with 200 hits. Analysis detected 1,574 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,352 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠17% (13,768 of 16,562 topics). This Romanticism is better (less manipulative) than 83.10% of the peer group.
Romanticism
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,352
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

17% percentile
025507510016.9% percentile
1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.9%1.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.0%2.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.4%5.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.0%6.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.4%1.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.8%0.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.0%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.1%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos