Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 435 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rock Chalk Park results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Halo Effect , and Self-Serving Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 28.7% saturation with 374 hits . Analysis detected 2,337 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,305 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 8.5% and a BS Rank of 90% (1,691 of 16,562 topics). This Rock Chalk Park is worse (more manipulative) than 89.80% of the peer group. Rock Chalk Park
Topic details
Total words: 1,305
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
90% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 89.8% percentile 8.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 28.7% 28.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 5.3% 5.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 18.5% 18.5% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Topic 14.8% 14.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.3% 6.3% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 18.6% 18.6% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Topic 9.3% 9.3% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Topic 7.4% 7.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 12.9% 12.9% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Topic 7.3% 7.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 28.7%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Topic 18.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 19.2% Halo Effect: Topic 18.5%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 15.9% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 14.8%, sitewide 3.7% Hasty Generalization: Topic 12.9%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 11.1% Bandwagon: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 2.2% Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 7.5% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 0.5% Recency Bias: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 2.7% In-Group Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 6.0% Primacy Effect: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 0.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Begging the Question: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.7% Circular Reasoning: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.9% Horn Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst