Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,132 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Robotic Surgery results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Anecdotal, and Appeal to Authority, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 6.6% saturation with 297 hits. Analysis detected 2,855 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,528 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠35% (10,822 of 16,562 topics). This Robotic Surgery is better (less manipulative) than 65.30% of the peer group.
Robotic Surgery
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,528
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

35% percentile
025507510034.7% percentile
2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.1%4.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.9%3.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.0%3.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.4%4.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.3%1.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.1%2.1%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.1%1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.8%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.5%Composition/Division: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.2%False Dilemma: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos