Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Robin Hood Legend results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Optimism Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 21% saturation with 213 hits. Analysis detected 1,120 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,016 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Robin Hood Legend is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Robin Hood Legend
Topic details
Total words: 1,016
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.1%4.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.4%2.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 13.7%13.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 7.1%7.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 21.0%21.0%Appeal to NatureSitewide 0.2%Topic 4.7%4.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 5.3%5.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 9.3%9.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 21.0%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 19.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 13.7%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 7.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 5.3%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to Nature: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 0.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 4.6%Hindsight Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.4%Recency Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.1%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos