Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video754 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Robert De Niro results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Status Quo Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16.3% saturation with 493 hits. Analysis detected 4,150 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,016 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of ⁠68% (5,389 of 16,562 topics). This Robert De Niro is worse (more manipulative) than 67.50% of the peer group.
Robert De Niro
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,016
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

68% percentile
025507510067.5% percentile
4.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.6%7.6%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Topic 11.9%11.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 7.1%7.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 10.4%10.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.4%0.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 11.7%11.7%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 6.4%6.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 16.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 11.7%, sitewide 15.9%Status Quo Bias: Topic 11.9%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 7.5%Indoctrination: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 0.0%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 2.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 6.0%Bandwagon: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 2.2%Anecdotal: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.8%, sitewide 0.8%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos