Topic summary
⁠26%1 analyzed article/video1,019 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Roadless Rule results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem, Negativity Bias, and Self-Serving Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 6.5% saturation with 199 hits. Analysis detected 1,771 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,057 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠17% (13,740 of 16,562 topics). This Roadless Rule is better (less manipulative) than 83.00% of the peer group.
Roadless Rule
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,057
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

17% percentile
025507510017.0% percentile
1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.6%2.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.6%4.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.5%6.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.7%1.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.0%1.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.9%0.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Ad Hominem: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%False Dilemma: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.5%Straw Man: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.8%Bandwagon: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos