Topic summary
⁠0%6 analyzed articles/videos7,429 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Road Trips results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 8.7% saturation with 3,080 hits. Analysis detected 29,216 faulty-reasoning hits from 35,400 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠19% (13,414 of 16,562 topics). This Road Trips is better (less manipulative) than 81.00% of the peer group.
Road Trips
Topic ranking list
Topic details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

19% percentile
025507510019.0% percentile
1.9% BS Score6 analyzed articles35.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.2%6.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.9%2.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.5%2.5%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 7.6%7.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.3%4.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.5%1.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.2%0.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 5.3%Halo Effect: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 8.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 0.5%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.3%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.1%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos