Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video2,262 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rights And Justice results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Politically Left Leaning Bias, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 24.4% saturation with 2,210 hits. Analysis detected 12,311 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,048 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of 69% (5,229 of 16,558 topics). This Rights And Justice is worse (more manipulative) than 68.40% of the peer group.
Rights And Justice
Topic details
Total words: 9,048
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

68% percentile
025507510068.4% percentile
4.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 11.6%11.6%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 11.7%11.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 22.3%22.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 24.4%24.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.7%0.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.5%1.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 10.6%10.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 11.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 24.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 22.3%, sitewide 15.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 11.7%, sitewide 2.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.5%, sitewide 3.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.0%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.0%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.1%Begging the Question: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos