Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,947 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Right To Try Law results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 7.1% saturation with 413 hits. Analysis detected 3,454 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,841 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠15% (14,116 of 16,562 topics). This Right To Try Law is better (less manipulative) than 85.20% of the peer group.
Right To Try Law
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 5,841
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

15% percentile
025507510014.8% percentile
1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.7%3.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.1%6.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.2%0.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.5%2.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.1%1.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.1%7.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.7%0.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Burden of Proof: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.4%Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos