Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video891 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ricardo Flores Magon results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Negativity Bias, with Politically Left Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 9% saturation with 320 hits. Analysis detected 1,864 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,564 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠30% (11,632 of 16,562 topics). This Ricardo Flores Magon is better (less manipulative) than 70.20% of the peer group.
Ricardo Flores Magon
Topic details
Total words: 3,564
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

30% percentile
025507510029.8% percentile
2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.0%1.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.4%4.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 9.0%9.0%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 7.1%7.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.1%1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.2%0.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.2%2.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 9.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 2.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 7.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 0.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 6.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.1%, sitewide 3.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.4%Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.0%Indoctrination: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos