Topic summary
⁠13%3 analyzed articles/videos930 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Retaliation results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Appeal to Authority, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.3% saturation with 1,210 hits. Analysis detected 11,853 faulty-reasoning hits from 16,522 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠14% (13,784 of 15,984 topics). This Retaliation is better (less manipulative) than 86.20% of the peer group.
Retaliation
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 16,522
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

14% percentile
025507510013.8% percentile
1.7% BS Score3 analyzed articles16.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.7%3.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.3%7.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.2%6.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.1%1.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.7%0.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.1%6.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.5%2.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.6%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Burden of Proof: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos