Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video720 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Restructuring results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Self-Serving Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.4% saturation with 271 hits. Analysis detected 2,265 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,880 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠34% (10,924 of 16,562 topics). This Restructuring is better (less manipulative) than 66.00% of the peer group.
Restructuring
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠34%Restructuring (selected)3%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 2,880
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

34% percentile
025507510034.0% percentile
2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.8%3.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.4%9.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.8%0.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.9%2.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.4%0.4%Sunk Cost EffectSitewide 0.3%Topic 4.1%4.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.5%, sitewide 3.3%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 5.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 3.7%Anecdotal: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 0.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 4.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.4%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos