Topic summary
2% 1 analyzed article/video 2,964 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Restaurant Review results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Self-Serving Bias , and Optimism Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 1.6% saturation with 141 hits . Analysis detected 1,210 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,892 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0.7% and a BS Rank of 1% (16,537 of 16,562 topics). This Restaurant Review is better (less manipulative) than 99.80% of the peer group. Restaurant Review
Topic details
Total words: 8,892
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.2% percentile 0.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles8.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.1% No True Scotsman: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 0.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst