Topic summary
⁠71%2 analyzed articles/videos957 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Restaurant Operations results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Fundamental Attribution Error, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.2% saturation with 544 hits. Analysis detected 3,827 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,828 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of ⁠63% (8,606 of 23,213 topics). This Restaurant Operations is worse (more manipulative) than 62.90% of the peer group.
Restaurant Operations
Topic details
Total words: 3,828
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

63% percentile
025507510062.9% percentile
3.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.1%4.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.7%1.7%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 13.3%13.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.0%2.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.8%3.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 14.2%14.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.0%1.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 4.8%4.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.1%3.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 14.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 15.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 13.3%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 6.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 2.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 1.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.5%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.8%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.6%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos