Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Restaurant Closure results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Appeal to Emotion, and Appeal to Authority, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 12.1% saturation with 1,164 hits. Analysis detected 6,907 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,640 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 15,766 topics). This Restaurant Closure is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Restaurant Closure
Topic details
Total words: 9,640
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles9.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.4%1.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.7%7.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.9%4.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 12.1%12.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.0%2.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 8.9%8.9%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 3.9%3.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Topic 12.1%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 5.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 0.5%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.0%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos