Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Resistance Movements results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Halo Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 5.1% saturation with 176 hits . Analysis detected 1,144 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,436 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Resistance Movements is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Resistance Movements
Topic details
Total words: 3,436
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 4.0% 4.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 5.1% 5.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.5% False Dilemma: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.1% Burden of Proof: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst