Topic summary
⁠85%2 analyzed articles/videos1,795 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Resignations results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Self-Serving Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 29.4% saturation with 1,976 hits. Analysis detected 7,101 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,731 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠57% (7,208 of 16,562 topics). This Resignations is worse (more manipulative) than 56.50% of the peer group.
Resignations
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 6,731
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

57% percentile
025507510056.5% percentile
3.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 14.5%14.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.8%4.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 29.4%29.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 12.4%12.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.8%0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.6%2.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.8%0.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.8%2.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Topic 29.4%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Topic 14.5%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 15.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 12.4%, sitewide 3.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 11.9%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.4%Recency Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.6%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.2%Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.5%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.1%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos